design element
SOFIA banner  
 
news image top Information for Researchers        
news image bottom
design element

 

Home > Information for Researchers > Proposal Calls > Basic Science FAQ

Basic Science FAQ

This page is to answer questions about Basic Science that we have been asked following the release of the Call for Proposals. The SOFIA Research FAQ may be found here.

Q
Can moving targets be observed during Basic Science? Are there any constraints? go to answer
Q
The on-line Target Visibility Tool does not appear to recognize some comet names. What is the standard format for specifying comet names? go to answer
Q
When I use SIMBAD lookup in the Visibility Tool (VT) for a named target, the name is either not recognized or the incorrect co-ordinates are returned. What is happening? go to answer
Q
Are staff scientists at the European Southern Observatory (ESO) in Garching allowed to propose for Basic Science observing time? go to answer
Q
Are scientists affiliated with German organizations allowed to be co-investigators on proposals submitted to the US-led part of Basic Science? If selected and implemented, would the proposed observations be counted against the German fraction of SOFIA observing time during Basic Science. go to answer
Q
Will including (or not including) an EPO program affect the evaluation of a Basic Science proposal? go to answer
Q
What kind of support is available for EPO activities during Basic Science for selected proposals? go to answer
 

Q: Can moving targets be observed during Basic Science? Are there any constraints?

A: Moving targets can be observed during Basic Science. The observing constraints are outlined in a white paper, "Observing Moving Targets during Basic Science".

 

 


back to top

Q: The on-line Target Visibility Tool does not appear to recognize some comet names. What is the standard format for specifying comet names?

A: VT queries the Minor Planet and Comet Ephemeris Service (MPES) maintained at the Center for Astrophysics, Harvard. The following examples show how comet identifiers should be entered into the VT target query field: unnumbered comets - "C/2008 Q3", "P/2006 T1" ; numbered periodic comets - "169P/NEAT" (no quotation marks). Due to the way text fields are interpreted, input strings that include names in addition to the designation may fail. For example, "C/2008 Q3 (Garradd)" will be rejected. Warning: using only the name (such as "Garradd"), rather than the designation will always result in an asteroid being returned if an asteroid of that name exists.

 

 




Q. When I use SIMBAD lookup in the Visibility Tool (VT) for a named target, the name is either not recognized or the incorrect co-ordinates are returned. What is happening?

A:For several target names that include the plus (+) or minus (-) sign, the VT/SIMBAD query mechanism does not correctly handle the string of text following the sign. As a consequence, the name is not recognized as a target, or the query defaults to a different target. For any such target name, we suggest querying SIMBAD directly and entering co-ordinates explicitly into VT.

 

 


Q. Are staff scientists at the European Southern Observatory (ESO) in Garching allowed to propose for Basic Science observing time?

A: Yes. Since ESO is an international organization, staff members are welcome to propose in response to the NASA sponsored call for Basic Science observations. However, since ESO is a non-US organization, successful proposers would not be eligible for grant support through USRA.

 

 


Q. Are scientists affiliated with German organizations allowed to be co-investigators on proposals submitted to the US-led part of Basic Science? If selected and implemented, would the proposed observations be counted against the German fraction of SOFIA observing time during Basic Science.

A: Scientists affiliated with German organizations are allowed to be co-investigators on proposals submitted to the US-led part of Basic Science. The proposed observations will not be counted against the German fraction of SOFIA time.

 

 


Q. Will including (or not including) an EPO program affect the evaluation of a Basic Science proposal?

A: No. While we will encourage investigators awarded Basic Science observing time to consider adding an E/PO component to their program, an E/PO component is not a requirement. An E/PO plan is not requested in the proposal, and will not be part of the proposal evaluation. (See section 1.8 of the Call for Proposals for the evaluation criteria.)

 

 



Q. What kind of support is available for EPO activities during Basic Science for selected proposals?

A: Examples of Basic Science E/PO activities might include: professional development workshop(s) for science educators in the GI's local area, establishing mentoring relationships between the GI and local teachers/classrooms, provision of SOFIA and NASA E/PO materials via the GI to local educators. Support for such activities could include: workshop logistics planning by the SOFIA E/PO group, 'per diem' and mileage for the GI to visit local schools and E/PO events, cost of material supplies and shipping. The PI of each successful Basic Science proposal will be contacted by the SOFIA E/PO team after the proposal selection is announced in order to discuss the possibility of an associated E/PO program. Plans and budgets will be finalized by mutual agreement between the GIs and the SOFIA E/PO team.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Page Last Updated: July 26, 2010

  design element
design element
design element
design element