| |
Following are some of
the questions sent in by viewers.
Do you have a question that
hasn't
been answered here? The SOFIA scientists and astronomers welcome
your questions. Please use the online form at Contact
Us to submit your question and the curator will direct your
inquiry to the appropriate person.
Also available: SOFIA Research Program FAQs
| Aircraft |
|
|
Could you explain the means by which
the air around the exposed part of the airframe is kept smoothly
flowing? I looked at the CFD calculations that compared the
two airframes but was unable to see the broader picture. Is
it a case of diverting the air away from the cutout? Nucleating
the turbulence somewhere else so it stays away from the cutout? |
 |
|
|
Could a hypersonic aircraft capable of flying
at Mach 6 and at an altitude of 100K - 200k feet also be useful
for infrared astronomy? |
 |
| Other |
|
|
What is the difference between SOFIA
research and what the Hubble can do? Is it that the Hubble is
all booked up? Or are they two different types of research or
applications? |
 |
|
|
Could a hypersonic aircraft capable of flying
at Mach 6 and at an altitude of 100K - 200k feet also be useful
for infrared astronomy? |
 |
Back
| TELESCOPE |
|
Q: What
is the material for the reflector and the temperature of the
focal plane?
A: The optics
temperature is 240K. The material for the reflector is Zerodur,
a unique glass ceramic material that effectively has zero
thermal expansion characteristics. See details in the paper,
"Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy", E.E. Becklin;
1997 in our SOFIA Archive.
|
|
Q: What
are the exact wavelengths that SOFIA will be studying?
A: The
wavelength covered by the nine first light instruments are
shown in this chart ( click on image for larger view) .
Back
|
|
Q: How
does SOFIA get clear pictures? Even at 12km there would still
be a lot of [airplane] turbulence and the pictures wouldn't
be very clear.
A: At visible
wavelengths, it is neither atmospheric turbulence, the refractive
action of mobile air cells which push light rays around, overhead
(actually there is not much air left overhead) that causes
the blurring problem, nor the aircraft and telescope shaking
that causes the problem, but rather the "shear layer" stream
of air shooting past the open airplane cavity where the telescope
sits, at 500 mph. This air motion worsens the resolution (the
opposite of blurring) to 3 arc secs at visible wavelengths.
But the problem at the long wavelengths is different
- it's diffraction. Basically, the far-infrared light observed
by SOFIA passes through the shear stream of air unperturbed.
But this light has such a long wavelength, 100x to 1000 times
the wavelength of visible light, that the SOFIA telescope
is of insufficient size to focus it sharply, and blurriness
results. At wavelengths in the far-infrared, like 60 micrometers,
there is significant blurring due to this effect. The telescope
is actually held extremely steady while observing occurs,
even in turbulence. It's held about as stable as a mountaintop
telescope sitting on a 10 meter cement foundation, but diffraction
still blurs the image.
So how do you do this? First, you isolate the
telescope from the airplane by mounting it on a spherical
pressurized oil bearing. The plane shakes and quakes, but
the telescope doesn't feel it. Second, you direct the wind
away from the telescope by shaping the side of the airplane
so as to deflect it, and install a little deflector fence
on the edge of the telescope cavity as well. Third, you stabilize
the telescope against sudden motion (wind does get through)
by spinning three orthogonal gyroscopes which are rigidly
attached to the structure, and fourth, you steer the telescope
so as to keep it steady, by tracking a distant star and giving
the telescope magnetical nudges to point it toward a fixed
direction.
|
|
Q: What
is the maximum time the telescope can be pointed at an object?
The object would eventually be out of the field of view, even
if you could adjust the telescope.
A: A few hours
is generally the maximum. Objects make arcs through the sky
due to the Earth's rotation. The motion of the airplane also
adds or subtracts at bit from this apparent object motion.
So, while observing a target, the telescope appears to be
following an arc in the sky, although it is actually staying
fixed dead-on to a distant point in deep space that just appears
to me moving. All that time, the airplane body slowly swings
in its own arc relative to the ground to keep the target at
a right angle to the airplane, so that the telescope can keep
peering out. Typically, after a few hours, the object has
either set too near the horizon, or risen too near the zenith
to track, or else the airplane has been flying so long in
one direction, it is getting too far from home. At this point,
another object, located in a different part of the sky is
turned to. These flights are carefully planned in advanced.
|
|
Q: What
is the anticipated normal operating temperature of the telescope?
The information on the website suggests a range of ambient
temperatures in the "cavity" from 210-330 K. Depending on
what is meant by this, it could have a *huge* impact on the
sensitivity!
A: The telescope
temperature is typically at the 41,000 ft ambient which is
about -50 C. Note that during the South Pole winter, temperatures
are about -80 C because of the inversion layer near the ice.
On the ground, the telescope is pre-cooled before the flight
such that the ambient 'at altitude' temperature is achieved
hours before the actual flight. The thermal time constant
for the telescope is expected to be about 2 hours. An aircraft
system is used to warm the cavity and dry the air during decent
from 41,000 ft. This is prevent water from moist lower altitude
air from condensing on the telescope optics. Water condensation
probably contributed to the deposition of small (high emissivity)
particles on the KAO (Kuiper Airborne Obs.) telescope. To
help with mirror cleanliness, we are planning to use the CO2
snow cleaning process on a regular basis. Another aspect of
telescope sensitivity is scattered light from the warm lower
atmosphere.
|
|
Q: Can
SOFIA see the Lunar Module crash sites on the surface of the
Moon and get a record of them for history?
A: You asked
if SOFIA can see very detailed features on the surface of
the Moon. The short answer is "No - such features are too
small."
Here is the long answer: The best resolution
(ability to see fine detail) of any of the world's telescopes
is about a tenth of an arc second (explained below). This
is achieved by the Hubble Space Telescope. (This statement
applies only to telescopes that use visible light and make
images or photographs.) The next best telescopes are the Keck
Telescopes in Hawaii and some telescopes in Chile. These can
see details about three tenths of an arc second. SOFIA does
not do as well as these telescopes, seeing details of one
or two arc seconds at the very best.
So the score card is: Hubble 0.1 Arc Sec (best);
Keck 0.3 Arc Sec many other telescopes are doing as well as
the Keck; SOFIA greater than 2.0 arc sec The reasons SOFIA
does not do as well is that it is a smaller telescope, it
looks through a current of turbulent air rushing by the jet
at 450 miles per hour, which blurs the light, and it looks
at longer wavelength light; infrared light. (SOFIA does see
more detail in infrared light and far-infrared light than
most telescopes, but it still can not see "better" than 2
arc seconds.
What does "resolution of a tenth of an arc second"
mean? It means that details that are 2 million times smaller
than the distance of the object can be seen. Therefore, a
telescope with a resolution of a tenth of an arc second (like
the Hubble) can pick out a 1 meter (3 foot) object that is
2 million meters away. A telescope with a resolution of two
arc seconds (like the SOFIA) can see a one meter object that
is 100,000 meters away.
Unfortunately the moon is 384 million meters
away (even for Hubble), so the Hubble can only make out objects
that are about 190 meters across. The Lunar modules are much
smaller than this. SOFIA only can see objects (craters) 20
time larger larger than this.
The best way to see sites on the Moon is to
orbit the Moon or visit it. The Moon landing sites (the terrain)
were photographed from the orbiting Command Modules on these
Apollo Missions. See these many photographs, for example:
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/images12.html#AVLO
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/apollocolor.html
Fortunately, the Solar System and the Universe
are full of some very large objects, so there will be plenty
to see with SOFIA!
|
| AIRCRAFT |
|
Q: Could
you explain the means by which the air around the exposed
part of the airframe is kept smoothly flowing? I looked at
the CFD calculations that compared the two airframes but was
unable to see the broader picture. Is it a case of diverting
the air away from the cutout? Nucleating the turbulence somewhere
else so it stays away from the cutout?
A: No, the air
is not diverted away from the cavity. The smooth air flow
over the fuselage is maintained by a passive aft ramp concept
incorporated in the cavity that causes the free stream shear
layer to reattach properly downstream of the cavity on the
passive ramp which maintains this flow attachment in a stable
manner. Wind tunnel tests have shown that the flow/turbulence
on the fuselage downstream of the cavity is only slightly
different than the original unmodified aircraft.
|
|
Q: Could
a hypersonic aircraft capable of fly at Mach 6 and at an altitude
of 100K - 200k feet also be useful for infrared astronomy?
A: While better
astronomy can be done at higher altitudes - the platform of
choice would likely use balloons rather than aircraft due
to cost. Examples of plans are NASA's Ultra long duration
balloon mission project and the current success of experiments
such as within Japan's ballooning program, and in the US,
Boomerang http://www.wff.nasa.gov/~code820/
|
| OTHER |
|
Q: What
is the difference between SOFIA research and what the Hubble
can do? Is it that the Hubble is all booked up? Or are they
two different types of research or applications?
A: The SOFIA
and Hubble Missions share several similarities: both have
very large "world class" telescopes (SOFIA 2.5 meter diameter,
Hubble 2.4 meter diameter), long mission lifetimes (SOFIA
20 years, Hubble 15 years) and each flies above most of the
Earth's atmosphere (SOFIA 12 kilometers, Hubble 600 kilometers).
The difference in research is that Hubble concentrates on
optical and ultraviolet light, while SOFIA concentrates on
infrared and far-infrared light. The reason for this is that
ultraviolet light does not get through our Earth atmosphere,
not even at the altitudes an airplane flies. But SOFIA can
see the infrared light from flight altitudes in the stratosphere.
Ultraviolet light and optical light are given-off
by energetic and violent processes in space that happen to
stars and galaxies; like nuclear burning, collisions, explosions,
falling into black holes. The Hubble has made many discoveries
in these areas of astronomy. At optical wavelengths, the Hubble
has exquisitely good eyesight (or "resolution") since it not
burdened at all by blurring caused by looking through the
Earth atmosphere. The Hubble has been able to peer into deep
space and see back into time, viewing the ancient universe
as it was billions of years ago.
Infrared light is given off by less energetic
processes in space in general. Warms clouds of gas and dust
reveal their properties at these wavelengths, and these clouds
will be studied by SOFIA. The surfaces and atmospheres of
planets and moons can be seen in the infrared too. Also clouds
of gas will be seen which will give birth to new stars, and
it will see the winds that will be springing up from stars
just born. The chemical elements and molecules, like H2, CO,
CO2, H2O, and the more exotic molecules will be seen floating
in space clumped together into clouds by gravity. The composition
of gas in space gives clues as to what sort of stars Milky
Way Galaxy has been forming in the past and what it will be
churning-out in the future. Sometimes these clouds hide interesting
objects within. With far-infrared light, there is a bonus;
far-infrared light can pass through clouds of gas and dust,
and so we can see inside objects with SOFIA that are opaque
to the Hubble.
The other difference between SOFIA and the Hubble
is that a great variety of instruments can be used by SOFIA,
since it lands daily and different instruments can be mounted
on the telescope. Astronomers go up into the stratosphere
and make sure their instruments work right. Hubble can only
be visited each 2-3 years and at great cost. In general, the
Hubble observatory costs billions of dollars; SOFIA costs
ten times less.
Hubble is all booked up and more. Hubble gets
10 times more requests for observing use from astronomers
than it can accommodate. But this is typical for observatories.
Good observatories are over-requested by factors of 2 to 10.
Of the dozens of "world class" observatories on Earth and
in space, all are used all of the time it is possible to use
them by astronomers, and there are many more astronomers waiting
in line. SOFIA will be no exception. This has to do with the
amazing discoveries in space that are just waiting to be made.
|
|
Q: How
much computer processing is done on the aircraft, and how
much is done on the ground?
A: The SOFIA aircraft
has computers on board that will record the incoming data,
and will also record the necessary information about the status
of the telescope, the instrument, and the observing conditions.
The computers on board the aircraft can also do a small amount
of analysis, so the scientists can get instant feedback to
see if the observations are being made correctly.
However, most of the analysis of the data is
done on the ground, back at the scientist's own university
or institution. It often takes many months before the scientist
can analyze the results from an observation and publish them
in a scientific journal.
|
Page Last Updated:
November 6, 2008
|